Wednesday, 14 September 2022

MMPC 002 - Human Resources Management - MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

Solutions to Assignments

                            MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

MMPC 002 - Human Resources Management

MMPC-002/TMA/JULY/2022

Note: Attempt all the questions and submit this assignment to the coordinator of your study centre. Last date of submission for July 2022 session is 31st October, 2022 and for January 2023 session is 30th April, 2023. 

Question No. 1. How did the concept of human resource management emerge? By explaining the functions of HRM describe the various perspectives of human resource management briefly.  
                                                                                CLICK HERE

Question No. 2. How do job analysis and job design address the problems of the HR planning process? Is Outsourcing an effective method of recruitment and selection? Briefly explain your views.                                                                                                    CLICK HERE

Question No. 3. Explain the importance of job analysis, job design, socialization and mobility in Human resource planning citing relevant examples.           CLICK HERE

Question No. 4. Why training, mentoring, compensation and reward management of an organization ensures effective human resource development? Explain with the help of recent trends in the corporate world.                                                                        CLICK HERE

Question No. 5. What is career development? Explain the process of career development citing examples.                                                                   CLICK HERE

Friday, 9 September 2022

Question No. 5 - MMPC 01 - Management Functions and Organisational Processes - MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

Solutions to Assignments

                            MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

MMPC 001 - Management Functions and Organisational Processes

MMPC-004/TMA/JULY/2022

Question No. 5. Briefly describe and discuss modern theories of leadership and the difference between successful vs. effective leader.

A. Charismatic Leadership Theories 

Charismatic leadership is a throwback to the old conception of leaders as being those who “by the force of their personal abilities are capable of having profound and extraordinary effects on followers.” Although the charismatic concept, or charisma, goes as far back as the ancient Greeks and is cited in the Bible, its modern development is often attributed to the work of Robert House. On the basis of the analysis of political and religious leaders, House suggests that charismatic leaders are characterized by self-confidence and confidence in their associates, high expectations for associates, ideological vision, and the use of personal example. Followers of charismatic leaders identify with the leader and the mission of the leader, exhibit extreme loyalty to and confidence in the leader, emulate the leader’s values and behaviour, and derive self-esteem from their relationship with the leader. Bass has extended the profile of charismatic leaders to include superior debating and persuasive skills as well as technical expertise and the fostering of attitudinal, behavioural, and emotional changes in their followers.

Charismatic leaders will produce in followers’ performance beyond expectations as well as strong commitment to the leader and his or her mission. Research indicates that the impact of such charismatic leaders will be enhanced when the followers exhibit higher levels of self-awareness and self-monitoring, especially when observing the charismatic leaders’ behaviours and activities and when operating in a social network. House and his colleagues provide some support for charismatic theory and research finds a positive effect on desirable outcomes such as cooperation and motivation, and recent conceptualization proposing that alternative forms (personalized versus socialized) are relevant to successful implementation of mergers and acquisitions. However, as with the other leadership theories, complexities are found and more research is needed. For example, one study that assessed charismatic leader behaviours, individual level correlates, and unit-level correlates (outcomes) in the military yielded only limited support for the theory’s propositions and led the researchers to conclude that greater sensitivity to multiple constituencies of leaders is needed in theories and studies focused on charismatic leadership. Also, extensions of the theory are being proposed. For example, Conger and Kanungo treat charisma as an attributional phenomenon and propose that it varies with the situation. Leader traits that foster charismatic attributions include self-confidence, impression management skills, social sensitivity, and empathy. Situations that promote charismatic leadership include a crisis requiring dramatic change or followers who are very dissatisfied with the status quo. For example, a study in a university setting revealed a situation in which a charismatic leader was able to successfully implement a technical change, but at the same time suffered through major political turmoil, which appeared to be side effects of the technical change.

This suggests that studies of charismatic leadership must be considered in the context in which the leader operates, and the nature of the task or work being performed should be included in the analysis. 

B. Transformational Leadership Theory 

Many years ago James MacGregor Burns identified two types of political leadership: transactional and transformational. The more traditional transactional leadership involves an exchange relationship between leaders and followers, but transformational leadership is based more on leaders’ shifting the values, beliefs, and needs of their followers. More recently, the “charisma” characteristic of transformational leadership has been changed to “idealized influence.” This was done to not confuse transformational with charismatic leadership, which Bass treats as different theories. Although there are a number of contrasts between the two theories, the major differentiators are how followers are treated. Key to transformational leaders is that they seek to empower and elevate followers(i.e., develop followers into leaders) while charismatic leaders may try to keep followers weak and dependent on them (i.e., instill personal loyalty to the leader rather than developing them to attain ideals).

In contrast to transactional leaders that behave in one of the ways Avolio notes that transformational leaders characterized by idealized leadership, inspiringleadership, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration represent a cluster of interrelated styles aimed at the following: 
1) Changing situations for the better 
2) Developing followers into leaders 
3) Overhauling organizations to provide them with new strategic directions 

Inspiring people by providing an energizing vision and high ideal for moral and ethical Conduct.

On the basis of his research findings, Bass concludes that in many instances (such as relying on passive management by exception), transactional leadership is a prescription for mediocrity and that transformational leadership leads to superior performance in organizations facing demands for renewal and change. He suggests that fostering transformational leadership through policies of recruitment, selection, promotion, training, and development will pay off in the health, well-being, and effective performance of today’s organizations.

A meta-analysis of 39 studies found that the transformational behaviours of charisma (idealized influence), individualized consideration, and intellectual stimulation were related to leadership effectiveness in most studies, but, except for the contingent reward behaviours, the transactional leadership styles did not enhance leadership effectiveness, and this more positive impact of transformational over transactional leadership has held through the years. For example, a recent meta-analysis of 87 studies found transformational leadership related (.44) to the composite of desired outcomes (follower job satisfaction, follower leader satisfaction, follower motivation, leader job performance, group or organizational performance and rated leader effectiveness). However, in this meta-analysis, contingent reward transactional leadership also related (.39) to the same composite of outcomes, and transformational leadership failed to significantly predict leader job performance.

C. Servant Leadership

A leadership approach coined by Robert K. Greenleaf (1970) in which the leader has a desire to “serve first” and leads in such a way that those being served “become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants.” Servant leadership exhibits an approach that is more humanistic and relationally oriented. The development in humanistic approaches to leadership is taking more progressive steps currently. Servant leaders lead because they want to serve others and they practically set examples before giving directions. The focus of servant leadership is on others rather than upon self and on understanding of the role of the leader as a servant. As a part of normative theory servant leadership emphasize the relationship of leaders and followers to each other and the importance of values on the process of leadership.

Servant leadership has not received as much attention as other leadership theories in the literature, but in recent years interest in it by the business organizations has grown. Servant leaders focus more on concern for their followers by creating conditions that enhance followers’ well-being and functioning and thereby facilitate the realization of a shared vision. Spears (1998) read the book on servant leadership by Greenleaf and then he briefed the characteristics of a servant leader. The ten characteristics mentioned are listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to the growth of people, and building community. Lastly, the motivational drivers in servant leadership include valuing people, developing people and building community, displaying authenticity and sharing leadership.

D. Substitutes for Leadership

Because of dissatisfaction with the progress of leadership theory and research in explaining and predicting the effects of leader behaviour on performance outcomes, some of the basic assumptions about the importance of leadership per se have been challenged over the years. One alternative approach that received attention proposed that there may be certain “substitutes” for leadership that make leader behaviour unnecessary and redundant, and “neutralizers” that prevent the leader from behaving in a certain way or that counteract the behaviour. These substitutes or neutralizers can be found in subordinate, task, and organization characteristics. For example, crafts persons or professionals such as accountants or software engineers may have so much experience, ability, and training that they do not need instrumental/task leadership to perform well and be satisfied. Those employees who don’t particularly care about organizational rewards (for example, professors or musicians) will neutralize both supportive/relationship and instrumental/task leadership attempts. Tasks that are highly structured and automatically provide feedback substitute for instrumental/ task leadership, and those that are intrinsically satisfying (for example, teaching) do not need supportive/relationship leadership. There are also a number of organizational characteristics that substitute for or neutralize leadership.

E. Authentic Leadership

Although there are a number of newly emerging theories such as servant leadership, political leadership, contextual leadership, e-leadership, primal leadership, relational leadership, positive leadership, shared leadership, and responsible leadership, in these times of unprecedented challenges facing organizational leaders, we (Avolio and Luthans and our colleagues working with the Leadership Institute at the University of Nebraska) believe that authentic leadership is a needed approach. Drawing from Luthans’s work on positive organizational behaviour and psychological capital, and Avolio’s work on transformational and full range leadership, recently proposed a specific model of authentic leadership development. Authenticity has its roots in ancient Greek philosophy (“To thin own self be true”) and descriptive words include genuine, transparent, reliable, trustworthy, real, and veritable.

Positive psychologists refer to authenticity as both owning one’s personal experiences (thoughts, emotions, or beliefs, “the real me inside”) and acting in accord with the true self (behaving and expressing what you really think and believe). Authentic leadership in organizations can be defined as:

A process that draws from both positive psychological capacities and a highly developed organizational context, which results in both greater selfawareness and self-regulated positive behaviors on the part of leaders and associates, fostering positive self-development. The authentic leader is confident, hopeful, optimistic, resilient, transparent, moral/ethical, future oriented, and gives priority to developing associates to be leaders.

F. Abusive Leadership

Abusive leaders exercise power to serve their own interest by dominating and authoritative ways to achieve what they want. They manipulate others to gain their purposes. They want to win at any cost. Although they know how to show that they are loyal and working for the organization, actuality they are preoccupied to be numberone. Baron and Neuman (1998) explain that abusive behaviour is the behaviour which is harmful to others. Ashforth (1994, 1997) defines petty tyranny as a manager’s use of power and authority cruelly, erratically, and unkindly. He finds following six dimensions of a petty tyrant: behaving in an illogical and conceited manner; putting down subordinate; lacking kindness for other; forcing divergence ruling; discouraging inventiveness and using non-contingent penalty. Tepper (2000) defines abusive supervision as the perception of subordinates about the hostile verbal and nonverbal behaviour of their supervisors which does not include physical abuse. He feels that supervisors may not mean to cause harm and are forced to act abusively in order to achieve some other goal.

SUCCESSIVE VS EFFECTIVE LEADER

As we have seen in the preceding discussions, leadership is the activity of influencing people to strive willingly for group objectives. It is the ability to persuade others to get something done. So the leader attempts to have some effect on the behaviour of another, which we call attempted leadership. The response to this attempt may or may not be successful. A basic responsibility of managers in any work organisation is to get the work done with and through people. The success of managers is measured by the output or productivity of the group they lead. Therefore, we should clearly distinguish between successful versus effective leader.




In the above figure, A's attempt to influence B to do a certain job can be judged successful or unsuccessful. B does the job for the reason that A has position of power and he controls the reward and punishment, then A's attempted leadership.is successful. 

A's style of leadership may not be compatible with B's expectation and B is made hostile towards A and does the job only because of A's position power; then we can say A has been successful, but not effective. B does the job because A can punish him for not doing it or reward him for doing it. B's own needs are not being accomplished by satisfying the goals of A (the leader) for the organisation. On the other hand, A's attempted leadership leads to a successful response and B does the job because he wants to do it and finds it rewarding, then we may say, A has both position power as well as personal power. B respects A, B is consistent with ' some personal goals and B sees personal goals as being accomplished by the job he does for A. 

We can then say A's leadership is effective. We should try to understand the difference between success and effectiveness. Success has to do with how the individual or the group behaves. Effectiveness describes the internal state or predisposition of an individual or a group and is thus attitudinal in nature. You may have noticed that individuals who are interested in success tend to emphasise their position power. They use close supervision of the work of their associates. If they have to be effective, they have to use their personal power as well as their general supervision. Examples of successful and effective individuals can be noticed if one understands the underlying acceptance of the superior by the subordinate. In the examination hall, a certain kind of teachers fear that if they leave the hall for a while the students will indulge in copying and exchanging notes. 

There are yet another kind of teachers who leave the examination hall, but the students never behave differently. Let us work at family level which is a less formal organisation. Parents can be successful and effective by using their position and personal power. The children easily accept the goals of the family as their own. Parents who use position power and a closer supervision, are likely to face a kind of revolt or disobeying attitude among their children not accepting the goals set by the parents for the family. With the absence of the parents, the whole house becomes topsy-turvy. This can never happen in 'a family where parents create a good deal of trust between them and the children by exercising their personal power of love and discipline. The children in the absence of parents do not behave differently than if their parents were there. 

Leaders are successful, but ineffective when they have a short-run influence over the behaviour of others. They must try to be both successful and effective to have long-term influence for leading others towards productivity and developing the organisation as a whole. The most important conclusion from the above discussion is that the managers must understand their own abilities and their impact on others. 


Question No. 4 - MMPC 01 - Management Functions and Organisational Processes - MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

Solutions to Assignments

                            MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

MMPC 001 - Management Functions and Organisational Processes

MMPC-004/TMA/JULY/2022

Question No. 4. What are the characteristics of an organizational culture? Briefly discuss how to build sustainable organizational culture including ethical culture with examples.

Organizational culture may be understood as a system within the organisation which fosters shared meaning by its members, differentiates it from the other organisations. The changing time has moved the expectation levels from desiring a good organizational culture to a great organizational culture. Typical features and characteristics of an organisation culture are: 

1. Alignment: Alignment of organizational values with employee motivation results in exceptional outcomes.
2. Innovation and risk taking: Degree of innovation and creativity by the employees within organisation.
3. Precision:Level of precision, analysis and attention to details expected from employees.
4. Outcome orientation: Level of management focus on results and outcomes rather than techniques and process used by the organisation.
5. Outcome orientation: Level of management focus on results and outcomes rather than techniques and process used by the organisation.
6. Team Orientation: Focus on development of task and activity for the group of people rather than individuals.
7. Aggressiveness: Environment of being competitive and aggressive rather than easygoing.
8. Stability: Ability of an organisation to maintain stability in contrast to growth.
9. Resilience: Responding to change makes organization resilient displaying empathy during the times of disruption, re-establishing normalcy.Degree of above stated characteristics varies from low to high depending on the type of organisation and activities within it. Few authors have described the following characteristics of organisational culture:
- Regularities in Behaviour:Interactions among employees within organisation are done in common language, terminology and rituals. 

- Rules and regulations:Each and every employee in organisation is bound to adhere to the rules laid down by the organisation. 

- Dominant values: Most of the organisations have strong and dominant values to be followed by each employee. These dominant values can be high efficiency, low absenteeism, high product quality etc. 

- Philosophy:Philosophy means beliefs and values of organisation which are in organisation’s policy which may be regarding treatment of customers and employees. 

 - Organisational climate: Environment of trust and harmony among employees, interdependence and reciprocity and commitment. All these collectively develop organisational climate. 

The world-famous Spanish painter Pablo Picasso once said- “Our goals can only be reached through a vehicle of a plan, in which we must fervently believe, and upon which we must vigorously act. There is no other route to success.” This reiterates the importance of planning in making a success story. Hence, we are on the path of understanding the clear line-of-action in building an organizational culture with built-in self-repair and autoupgradation modes.

Depiction of the route-map is distributed into 9 landmarking steps. 

They are: 

i. Shine in recognition:Recognition is a great lure for improvement. In an era, where around 76% employees don’t feel that they are recognised and acknowledged for their contributions; a personalized message to the employees can make remarkable business impact. Social recognition when bundled with monetary reward makes the firm move with an irresistible force. 

ii. Gift voice to the employees:Expression of ideas, feelings, and opinions often emerges as the feedback-pool. The various kinds of listening tools may ease the process of feedback collection. 

iii. Human intervention: To analyse the results, paying minute attention to the subtle expressions will make the nonverbal channel of communication create visible organizational strength. Gallup world poll has showed that the managers who get constant feedback bring in 9% more profitability as compared with managers who do not receive any feedback or suggestions on their strengths. In today’s context where gig economy, and hybrid work culture is at an all-time peak, gifting freedom of coercion-free expression will boost the strength of remote working 

iv. Redefine culture advocates to be the leaders: Acknowledgement is the simplest yet the most effective tool of motivation. The path of culture advocacy is hard to walk. Benchmarking culture advocates as leaders creates significant amount of influence on the mind of the team of workers. Such a practice begins the root-level correction at the tender minds of new employees. Studies have shown that, when leaders follow the values of the company, others to follow the suit. Building a culture where every aspect of the values of the company are valued and prioritized at every aspect of the work life is the need of the hour. 

v. Outlive organizational values:Values are the unique identification set of traits of an organization. Delivering to meet the values enables growth of an enriched culture and improved identity of the employee as a man of values. Projecting such employees boost the motivation of the others, hence creating a value-pull. Volunteering such actions leaves impactful impressions, and future course of action. 

vi. Forge teams: Teams are the pool of different sets of strengths. The unique strength of one when forged with another unique trait gives rise to invincible organization traits. This helps the firm to cross the just notifiable difference (JND) seamlessly creating competitive advantage to reap tall profits. 

vii. Focus on the holistic development: The modern era of development has widened the employer’s perspective. Offering employees various skill upgradation courses motivates the employee to contribute to the growth of the parent company. This has a dual impact on the company: first, it ensures enrichment of the human capital and second, curbs the turnover intention.Focus on the holistic development flaunts a culture of learning in the organization. Soft-skill development is deeply respected in the business fraternity. Companies with a constantly fuelled learning and development budget are likely to grow much faster than the ones who do not invest on training. 

viii. Culture- as an irrevocable intangible:Company’s culture being the valued-most intangible need to be nurtured with utmost care. Finding culture-fit through focussed questions at the very stage of hiring eliminate the inclusion of employees who either possess a culture-mis-fit or culture-poor-fit. Misalignment of employee’s expectation with that of the organization’s expectation results in high turnover ratio. Culturally aligned employees not only stay for a long-time but also enjoy their work tenure. 

ix. Tailor-made employee experience: With the liberalization, world has become a global village. Companies are able to attract talent from every nook and corner, hence also attracting their pre-existing cultures. Using the power of experience, the organization needs to mindfully align the culture of individual employee to that of the corporate. Creation of tailormade highly personalized employee experience generates great amount of trust on the culture of the parent organization. 

x. Showing proactive allyship: The employees feel powerless at the encounter of unfortunate situations. Companies may plunge to protect their interests even at the cost of the firm’s financial profit, so as to depict the ‘we care for you’ in practice, hence acting as an ally. The allyship strengthens the bond between the employee and the organizational culture. 

Thursday, 8 September 2022

Question No. 3 - MMPC 01 - Management Functions and Organisational Processes - MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

Solutions to Assignments

                            MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

MMPC 001 - Management Functions and Organisational Processes

MMPC-004/TMA/JULY/2022

Question No. 3. Discuss and describe the importance of Directing as a function of management. Illustrate with examples. 

While studying the characteristics of directing you must have realized that, every activity performed in the organisation is initiated through directing. Directing integrates people from all levels of management towards achievement of common objectives. Through directing managers instruct their subordinates about ‘what they should do’, ‘when they should do’ and ‘how they should do’ and ensure that all instructions are followed and implemented in proper perspective.

Importance of Directing

Directing or Direction function is said to be the heart of management of process and therefore, is the central point around which accomplishment of goals take place.

Being the central character of enterprise, the importance of direction is explained as under:

1. Direction Initiates Actions: Directions are the function which is the starting point of the work performance of subordinates. It is from this function the action take place; subordinates under­stand their jobs and perform according to the instructions given to them. All the predetermined plans can be implemented only when the actual work starts. It is there that direction becomes beneficial. Through direction, management conveys and motivates individuals in the organi­zation to function in the desired way to get organizational objectives. Without direction, other managerial activities like planning, organizing and staffing become ineffective.

2. Direction Integrates Employees’ Efforts: Successful achievement of organizational objectives is only possible when efforts of every individual are directed towards the same. Through direction, the superiors are able to guide, inspire and instruct the subordinates to work. It is through direction only; the efforts of every department can be related and integrated with others. Integration of efforts brings effectiveness and stability in the organisation. Thus, individuals’ efforts need to be integrated so that organization achieves its objectives in the most efficient manner and this is possible through direction only.

3. Direction Attempts to Get Maximum out of Individuals: A manager makes use of the elements like motivation, leadership, and communication to improve the performances of subordinates. Direction provides the way to utilize these capabilities and also it helps in increasing these capabilities. Superior performance of employees is ensured by proper direction to them.Proper direction to subordinates by managers enables the organization to get best from their subordinates. Organization performance improves greatly when every employee gives his best to the organization.

4. Direction Facilitates Changes in the Organization: Directing enables the organization to cope up with the changing conditions of the environment through effective communication and leadership. It is general human tendency to show resistance to change. Adaptability with changing environment both internal and external helps in the success of business. Before the change is introduced, the employees may be informed about the nature of changes and the benefits that are likely to follow and they may be taken into confidence through effective leadership and motivation and guidance.

5. Direction Provides Stability and Balance in the Organization: Effective leadership, communication and motivation, provide stability in the orga­nization and maintain balances in the different parts of the organization. Thus, organization exists for a long period and its parts work in a harmonious way.

6. Aims at Maximum Output: Every individual in the organisation has some potentiality and capability. But, in the absence of motivation, leadership, communication and other elements of direction may not be utilized fully. Direction provides the way to utilize these capabilities and also it helps in increasing these capabilities.

7. Aims to Achieve Organisational Objectives: Accomplishment of organisational objectives depends on the integration of the individual inputs of all the employees. These individual inputs can be coordinated with the help of direction.

8. Ensures Better Human Relations: Direction helps in understanding the nature and needs of employees. Nature of employees can only be understood through two-way communication. Employee needs can be satisfied through financial incentives.

9. Supplements other Managerial Functions: In the process of managing, the manager has to perform many management functions, such as planning, organizing, staffing and controlling. To produce desired results, all these functions are initiated and actuated. And without effective direction, managerial functions remain less effective.

10. Ensures Better Discipline among Employees: Disciplined human force is needed for the smooth functioning and the success of the organisation. Through the process of directing, orders and instructions are given to the subordinates and they are inspired and motivated to follow them. The main purpose of direction is to get things done by subordinates. By supervising, guiding, educating and overseeing the activities of subordinates, they are made to work in a disciplined manner.


Direction as an indispensable managerial function, since it is mainly concerned with human relations. Direction plays a very important role in management. Planning, organising and staffing are not enough. The management must stimulate action by giving orders to the subordinates and by supervising them as they proceed with their work. Direction is the heart of administration. It is the direction to subordinates only that secures greater or less efforts from employees and make.

The performance satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Management’s ability is to put to test by its capability of direction. Planning and organising are only preparations for works whereas performance and the real work begins with the directing function of management. Direction motivates, direction commands and direction controls the organisation. Direction provides necessary leadership in the business. It is a process of integration also. It is concerned with securing the fullest co-operation of people for the realisation of objectives.

This co-operation can be achieved only by good organisational communication, people oriented supervision and motivation. Favourable and healthy conditions must exist both within and outside the enterprise for enabling employees to develop their attitude to work. Directing play an important role in this process. It stimulates the plans and enlightens the organisation. It keeps the actives continued.

As a matter of fact, without the issuance of directions or orders as well as without guiding and supervising the subordinates, nothing would be accomplished. Direction does not get only the work done, but it develops future managers also.

Question No. 2 - MMPC 01 - Management Functions and Organisational Processes - MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

Solutions to Assignments

                            MBA and MBA (Banking & Finance)

MMPC 001 - Management Functions and Organisational Processes

MMPC-004/TMA/JULY/2022

Question No. 2. Discuss the necessity of having Planning and how it helps organisations. Describe various types of planning and their merits.

The fast-changing business environment creates the need for development and planning. An organization that adopts a lackadaisical approach in the identification of environmental change would surely struggle to survive and grow. The following point shows how planning is an important management function:

1. Ensures selection of optimum goals: planning is the cognitive and intellectual process of selecting the best course of action from various available alternatives. It is also about selecting one course of action that has sound chances of being profitable, feasible, achievable and economical and reject the other courses of actions that are not so feasible and profitable. The selected course of action ensures the overall growth of an organization keeping in mind the organizational limitations in terms of resources, time limit, objectives and strategies. In overall development of the organization, it is necessary to optimize the overall operation of the organization and sub-optimization of other departments.

2. Manages complexities: a single organization is a function of the heterogeneous group of human resource who possess different KSA, values, belief, culture and motivation level. In such heterogeneous working environment, it is obvious to have a disharmony in terms of organizational and individual interest. An effective plan of organization is a way to create a common interest among individual of an organization who works together towards the accomplishment of organizational goals in which they have shared common goals too. Thus planning is a way towards goal directing activity.

3. Survive environmental change: the business environment witness tremendous change now and then. From a conservative business model to democratic, global business scenario has left the business houses to keep itself updated to meet changing demands with changing environment. Change in demand, change in technologies, fashion, preferences, social values significantly affect the organizational normal course of operation. Management must strive to grab the opportunity to take advantage of the changed situation by adapting and adjusting its inputs to meet new demand and preferences of customers. Proper, scientific and systematic planning helps to survive in the turbulent situation created out of environmental change.

4. Protection from failure: unpredictable change in consumer’s taste and preferences, cut-throat competition, rapid technological change, economic slowdown, political disturbances significantly affect the nation and so business houses. Sometimes these changes are so adverse that leads to complete business failure. However, many organizations could not survive these radical changes due to ineffective planning and faulty decision making. It cannot be denied that planning cannot eliminate all business failures, but it can surely help in identification and evaluation of business opportunities and threats and examining the various course of action thereafter.

5. Unity of action: since the organization works with joint efforts of an individual with different KSAs, thus their harmonious working is necessary towards accomplishment of organizational goals. This is possible with efficient planning that provides stake to employees to work jointly for organizational success.

6. Supports control and coordination: Planning function supports other management function such as control and coordination. What, when,how and by whom a function is to be performed, all these are planned and worked out well in advance. This helps in easy and timely performance appraisal and finding the deviation thereof. In the absence of planning neither the performance would be of quality nor can the standard of performance be established effectively. This will lead to poor performance, delay in completion of tasks, wastages, chaos and ultimately control and coordination would suffer. Proper planning can ensure establishment performance standards scientifically and systematically, timely and effective performance measurement, timely identification and elimination of deviations and thus harmonious function at the workplace.

7. Planning Promotes Innovative Ideas:It is clear that planning selects the best alternative out of the many available. All these alternatives do not come to the manager on their own, but they have to be discovered. While making such an effort of discovery, many new ideas emerge and they are studied intensively in order to determine the best out of them. In this way, planning imparts a real power of thinking in the managers. It leads to the birth of innovative and creative ideas. For example, a company wants to expand its business. This idea leads to the beginning of the planning activity in the mind of the manager.

8. Planning Facilitates Decision Making: Decision making means the process of taking decisions. Under it, a variety of alternatives are discovered and the best alternative is chosen. The planning sets the target for decision making. It also lays down the criteria for evaluating courses of action. In this way, planning facilitates decision making.


BENEFITS FROM ORGANISATIONAL PERSPECTIVE: 

• Gives an organization a sense of direction Without plans and goals, organizations merely react to daily occurrences without considering what will happen in the long run. For example, the solution that makes sense in the short term doesn't always make sense in the long term. Plans avoid this drift situation and ensure that short range efforts will support and harmonize with future goals. 

• Focuses attention on objectives and results Plans keep the people who carry them out focused on the anticipated results. In addition, keeping sight of the goal also motivates employees. 

• Establishes a basis for teamwork Diverse groups cannot effectively cooperate in joint projects without an integrated plan. Examples are numerous: Plumbers, carpenters, and electricians cannot build a house without blueprints. In addition, military activities require the coordination of Army, Navy, and Air Force units. 

• Helps anticipate problems and cope with change When management plans, it can help forecast future problems and make any necessary changes up front to avoid them. Of course, surprises — such as the 1973 quadrupling of oil prices — can always catch an organization short, but many changes are easier to forecast. Planning for these potential problems helps to minimize mistakes and reduce the “surprises” that inevitably occur. 

• Provides guidelines for decision making Decisions are future oriented. If management doesn't have any plans for the future, they will have few guidelines for making current decisions. If a company knows that it wants to introduce a new product three years in the future, its management must be mindful of the decisions they make now. Plans help both managers and employees keep their eyes on the big picture. 

• Serves as a prerequisite to employing all other management functions Planning is primary, because without knowing what an organization wants to accomplish, management can't intelligently undertake any of the other basic managerial activities: organizing, staffing, leading, and/or controlling.
 
TYPES OF PLANNING

Based on the organizational objectives and goals the planning can broadly be classified into three main categories. These are Strategic Planning, Tactical Planning and Operational planning. The organization works in an uncertain business environment. Thus it is susceptible to various threats as well as opportunities from the environment. When an organization analyzes possible threats and competitive opportunities within the environment and evaluates its strength and weaknesses to position itself to take the advantage of the environment or survive the adverse the organization plans strategically. Strategic planning involves long term commitment often five or more years. This planning is complex as it includes the entire organization and formulation of objectives. Generally, strategically planning is done in the view of organizational vision and mission. Since it is long term and highly technical therefore top management is involved in it. On the other hand, tactical planning of less long term in nature usually for one to three years and it is about developing means and mechanism to be adopted for the implementation of strategic plans. In simple words, tactical planning is “how to implement” strategic plans. This planning is about implementation therefore middle-level managers are involved in such planning process. The third type of planning i.e. operational planning seems to functional planning where organization-wide or goals and objective for each unit or sub-unit is established ways to achieve them is looked for. Operational planning is shortterm planning for less than one year as it aims to eliminate current operational problems. Planning at this level supports at the higher-level planning of tactical and strategic.

The above discussion classified the planning into three broad categories, however, planning can also be classified based on the time frame involved in it. Broadly plans under planning are divided into three parts i.e. Long-term plans, medium-term plans and short-term plans. Plans those are highly technical and deals with the competitive aspect of the organization are termed as long term plans as they involve allocation of resources for a long period usually between five and fifteen years. However they may vary concerning their nature, scope, complexity, and size and are usually somewhat vague. These plans are more susceptible to uncertain events that may leave a significant impact on the organization. Such as technological changes, change in consumer behaviour, government policies can significantly affect the organization and involves serious attention of top management to make a long-term plan. Plans that are relatively detailed and specific and usually range between two and five years are medium-term plans. These plans are operational as decisions like raw material purchase; overhead expenses, labour wages, production etc are taken. Though these decisions are also crucial to an organization, yet any flaw in planning would not result in serious failure, as it can be altered in two-three years. Similarly in shortterm plans for about a year or so are more specific and deals with day to day operation such as inventory management, employees training etc.

Plans can be classified based on the nature and scope of plans. Based on their nature and scope of plans, plans can be standing and of repeated nature that is used repeatedly. In such plans, objectives, policies, procedures, rules and strategies are developed. These plans serve as guidelines to carry out business activities. When an organization has a single-use plan, it usually establishes programmes and budgets.

Types of Plans: As the plans are all pervasive, they are made at every level of organization with different purposes and perspectives. Accordingly they may take various shapes and stand differently in the hierarchy of importance.

The most popular ways to describe organizational plans are by their: 
1. Coverage – Strategic, tactical, and operational, 
2. Time frame – Short and long term, 
3. Specificity – Specific versus directional, 
4. Frequency of use – Single use and standing. 

Note that these planning classifications aren’t independent. For instance, short-and long- term plans are closely related to strategic and operational ones. And single-use plans typically are strategic, long term, and directional. 
1. Strategic, Tactical and Operational Plans: a. Strategic Plans: Strategic plans are designed to meet the broad objectives of the organization – to implement the mission that provides the unique reason for organization’s existence. They are set at the top managerial level, and are meant to guide the whole organization. 

An organization’s strategic plan is the starting point for planning. The aim of strategic planning is to help a company select and organize its businesses in a way that would keep the company healthy in spite of unexpected upsets occurring in any of its specific businesses or product lines. 

For example- in order to deal with uncertainties of raw material availability, a company’s strategic plan may purport to acquire its own facilities for generating raw material. Strategic plan serves as a guide to the development of sound sub plans to accomplish the organizational objectives. 

b. Tactical Plans: Top level managers set the strategies that an organization should focus to achieve organizational goals. Examples of strategies include set-up a plant to generate raw material for the organization’s manufacturing activities, explore North-East market, and likewise. Middle managers interpret these strategies and develop tactical plans for their departments that follow strategies in order to contribute to the organizational goals. In order to develop tactical plans, middle management needs detail reports (financial, operational, market, external environment). Tactical plans have shorter time frames and narrower scopes than strategic plans. Tactical planning provides the specific ideas for implementing the strategic plan. It is the process of making detailed decisions about what to do, who will do it, and how to do it. 

c. Operational Plans: The supervisor interprets the strategic and tactical management plans as they apply to his unit. This way, he makes operational plans to support tactical plans. These plans provide the details of how the strategic plans will be accomplished. Examples of planning by supervisors include scheduling the work of employees and identifying needs for staff and resources to meet future changes. Operating plans tend to be repetitive and inflexible over the short run. Change comes only when it is obvious that plans and specific action steps are not working. There are two main type of operational plans – Single use plans which are developed to achieve specific purposes and dissolved when these have been accomplished; standing plans are standardized approaches for handling recurring and predictable situations. Note that Tactical plans are based on the organization’s strategic plan. In turn, operational plans are based on the organization’s tactical plans. These are specific plans that are needed for each task or supportive Activity comprising the whole. Strategic, tactical, and operational planning must be accompanied by controls. Monitoring progress or providing for follow-up is intended to ensure that plans are carried out properly and on time. Adjustments may need to be made to accommodate changes in the external and/ or internal environment of the organization.

2. Short-Range and Long-Range Plans: Time is an important factor in planning. George Terry says, “The time period covered by planning should preferably include sufficient time to fulfil the managerial commitments involved.” Generally a short range planning (SRP) means a plan for one or two years and long range planning (LRP) means a plan for three to five years or more. Though this division may be considered as arbitrary, but it may have a general acceptability. This period of course, may vary according to the nature and size of business. When a concern requires long gestation period, it is natural that the long range planning may cover a longer period than five years. For exampleorganizations, such as oil or mining companies, or airlines must make long range planning because of their particular purposes and objectives. A home video-rental store or a book store might concentrate on seasonal or annual goals. However, whatever the period of planning, it should not be too rigid. It should rather be flexible to meet the unknown factors of the future. If a concern adopts both short-term and long-term planning, the short-term planning should fit in with long-term planning. It is important, for managers, to understand the roles of both long range and short range planning in overall planning scheme.

3. Specific and Directional Plans: Specific plans are established to achieve a specific purpose and dissolves when the purpose is accomplished. For example- a manager who seeks to increase his firm’s sales by 20 per cent over a given twelve-month period might establish specific procedures, budget allocations, and schedules of activities to reach that objective. These represent specific plans. Directional plans identify general guidelines. They provide focus but do not lock managers into specific objectives or courses of action. Instead of following a specific plan to cut costs by 4 per cent and increase revenues by 6 per cent in the next six months, a directional plan might shoot for improving corporate profits by 5 to 10 per cent every year. Intuitively it seems right that specific plans would be preferable to directional or loosely guided plans, because they have clearly defined objectives. There is no ambiguity, no problem with misunderstandings. However, in certain circumstances, like in case of fast changing environment, directional plans provide the flexibility required to cope with the changing situations.

4. Single Use and Standing Plans: A single-use plan is a one-time plan specifically designed to meet the needs of a unique situation and created in response to non-programmed decisions that managers make. In contrast, standing plans are ongoing plans that provide guidance for activities repeatedly performed in the organization. Standing plans are created in response to programmed decisions that managers make and include the policies, rules, and procedures.

i. Single-Use Plans: Single-use plans are detailed courses of action that probably will not be repeated in the same form in the future. For example- a firm planning to set up a new warehouse because it is expanding rapidly will need a specific single-use plan for that project, even though it has established a number of other warehouses in the past. It will not be able to use an existing warehouse plan, because the projected warehouse presents unique requirements of location, construction costs, labour availability, zoning restrictions, and so forth. The major types of single-use plans are programs, projects, and budgets.
a. Programs: A program covers a relatively large set of activities. 
The program shows- 
(1) the major steps required to reach an objective, 
(2) the organization unit or member responsible for each step, and 
(3) the order and timing of each step. 

The program may be accompanied by a budget or a set of budgets for the activities required. A program may be as large in scope as placing a person on the moon or as comparatively small as improving the reading level of fourth-grade students in a school district. Whatever its scope, it will specify many activities and allocations of resources within an overall scheme that may include other single-use plans as projects and budgets.
 
b. Projects: Projects are the smaller and separate portions of programs. Each project has limited scope and distinct directives concerning assignments and time. In the warehouse example, typical projects might include the preparation of layouts, a report on labour availability, and recommendations for transferring stock from existing facilities to the new installation. Each project will become the responsibility of designated personnel who will be given specific resources and deadlines. c. Budgets: Budgets are statements of financial resources set aside for specific activities in a given period of time. They are primarily devices to control an organization’s activities and so are important components of programs and projects. Budgets itemize income as well as expenditures and thus provide targets for such activities as sales, departmental expenses, or new investments. Managers often use budget development as the process by which decisions are made to commit resources to various alternative courses of action. In this sense, budgets can be considered single-use plans in their own right.

ii. Standing Plans: a. Policies: A policy is a general statement designed to guide employees’ actions in recurring situations. It establishes broad limits, provides direction, but permits some initiative and discretion on the part of the supervisor. Thus, policies are guidelines. Some policies deal with very important matters, like those requiring strict sanitary conditions where food or drugs are produced or packaged. Others may be concerned with relatively minor issues, such as the way employees dress. Policies are usually established formally and deliberately by top managers of the organization. Policies may also emerge informally and at lower levels in the organization from a seemingly consistent set of decisions on the same subject made over a period of time. For example- if office space is repeatedly assigned on the basis of seniority, that may become organization policy. In recent years policy has also been set by factors in the external environment—such as government agencies that issue guidelines for the organization’s activities (such as requiring certain safety standards). 

b. Procedures: A procedure is a sequence of steps or operations describing how to carry out an activity. It is more specific than a policy and establishes a customary way of handling a recurring activity. Thus, less discretion on the part of the supervisor is permissible in its application. For example- the refund department of a large discount store may have a policy of “refunds made, with a smile, on all merchandise returned within seven days of purchase.” The procedure for all clerks who handle merchandise returned under that policy might then be a series of steps like these- (1) Smile at customer. (2) Check receipt for purchase date. (3) Check condition of merchandise … and so on. Such detailed instructions guide the employees who perform these tasks and help insure a consistent approach to a specific situation.

OBJECTIVES: the future goals and desired state that an organization strives to achieve in future. Objectives are road map or direction path that keeps an organization attentive and focused towards its goals and helps in dodging obstacles. Peter Drucker say that an organization mostly has objectives related to market share, innovation, productivity, profitability, physical and financial resources, performance and development etc. Charles Perrow classified objectives into five categories namely; Societal objectives (cultural values, production of goods and services), output objectives, system objectives, product objectives and Derived objectives (community development). Though organizational objectives are vital to an organization, yet it suffers from the problem of quantification. 
Where objectives stated in quantitative terms are easily understandable, qualitative objectives are vague and confusing. For example, the objective of cost reduction, ROI on investment, market share, reduction in cost by one-third, fifteen increase in profit, ten percent return on capital etc are explicitly stated and are not subject to vagueness and confusion. Qualitative objective such as maximizing customer satisfaction through quality performance, maintaining an ethical relationship with stakeholders etc are necessary but vague in terms of a clear definition of satisfaction, quality performance and ethics. Objectives that are clear and unambiguous are sure to be achieved. 

Management by Objectives (MBO) Management by objective is the scientific and strategic approach to enhance the organizational objective wherein goals and objectives of organizations are clearly stated, define and conveyed by the managers to the entire organization. The crucial step of defining the objective under this approach is to monitor and evaluate employees’ performance against the stated objectives. Ideally, under this approach, employees themselves set their goals and course of action that effectively fulfil their obligation. In other words, MBO is a scientific strategy to establish objectives jointly by managers and subordinates and desire to achieve them with achieving organizational objectives simultaneously. MBO approach follows the following six steps:

1. Defining organizational objectives/goals with the help of different managers and supervisors. Based on organization status and performance, objectives to be achieved in specific time are established. A broad range of objectives that are critical to the organization is established and most top-level managers are involved in this step. 

2. Defining objectives for employees: after establishing the general broad organizational objectives, plans and procedures, managers are superiors discuss and work with their subordinates to establish their objectives. This step is crucial enough as the personal objectives of employees motivate them to work towards organizational objectives. Managers and superiors discuss the need, goals, time and resources required by the employees to achieve their objective and organizational objective ultimately. Employees present their thought and ideas about what departmental objectives are necessary to be framed and achieved. 

3. Regular monitoring performance and progress: since an organization is managed by managing the objectives of an organization. Thus, apart from increasing managerial efficiency, regular monitoring and progress of employees are necessary. Close monitoring of performance ensures eliminating performance deviation and flaws. 

4. At this step performance of each employee concerning performance standard and objectives are evaluated by the concerned managers of supervisors. 

5. Providing Feedback: feedback step is very crucial under management by objective approach. Continuous feedback on performance helps the employees to manage their performance quality and correcting their actions. Feedback at a particular point of time should be replaced with continuous feedback through regular formal and informal meetings of superiors and subordinates. In this way, probable performance deviation can be eliminated and progress can be ensured. 

6. Performance Appraisal: the routine of performance of an employee by the managers is the final step under the MBO approach. 

Management by objectives offers several benefits to the organization such as it ensures better communication between managers and subordinates while objectives for organization and employees are set, makes job clarity amongst subordinates, it leads to increase in motivation level of employees as they feel more connected with the organization being part of the planning process, and it also ensures the close monitoring too of performance of employees. Ultimately, MBO improves the planning process. Despite several benefits to the organization and employees, MBO is engulfed in various demerits and limitations. Since it involves setting clear and unambiguous objectives for organization as well as employees, a lot of paperwork is involved in it. Regular meetings and sessions are conducting with managers and subordinates to set objectives and detailed records are maintained. Secondly, many a time, lower levels of management are kept outside the objectivesetting process and thus the process becomes less democratic. Thirdly, where poor performance is closely monitored and managed, exceptionally good performances do not get any incentive. Moreover, MBO faces the problem of defining the objectives with clarity, devising suitable means to achieve them, difficulty in avoiding conflicts.

Policies: Policies refers to guides to think about the actions to be taken to make decisions with regards to organizational objectives. It is ready reference and answer to all the questions that may arise in due course of time in running the organization. These are broad, comprehensive and flexible to define the course of actions to be followed to attain objectives. In other words, it eliminates the possible confusion of objectives and makes the objectives more concrete and static. Though they are not about any decision yet it sets the boundary and limits within which decision should be made. For instance, an organization aiming at reducing the poverty level within a particular area may hire employees from that local area only. A good policy is the one that is broad, consistent, adequate in numbers, practical and flexible. The policy formulated must be outlined broadly leaving more scope for managers to decide within the limit. It need not cover every detail as it would become more particular and less scope would be there to make a decision. Since many policies resort to many questions, there are chances that one policy may contradict others. Such a situation must be avoided and hence policies formulated must be consistent and not mutually contradictory. The policy of an organization binds itself in a single thread with which is it known. Hence it is an image builder. A policy must be logical and practical so that every member of an organization can rely on that and managers can make a decision effectively. Lastly, it must be flexible enough to incorporate any probable change and uncertainty.

Procedures: A good objective and good policy may not lead to the desired result until a clear way and mean to achieve them are not established. An organization that does not ponder upon the procedure to be followed for accomplishing its objectives and policies to be implemented is certain to flounder. Questions like what, when and by whom a task would be performed. An effective procedure ensures easy to control, standardisation, consistency, coordination and communication. 

Rules: in a general term, rules are norms set by the organization that governs what and what not to be done under a certain situation. It is the self-imposed principle of action and varies with the situation. Rules set the parameters to be followed and standards to be achieved. Hence it does not leave any scope for decision making. Deviations or violations of rules usually lead to punishment.

Strategies: derived from the Greek word “strategi” which means the office of the general. Strategy refers to the organizational overall plan to attain the objectives working under the ambit of uncontrollable environmental forces. In an uncertain external environment, the organization is exposed to various threats as well as opportunities. In such situations, an enterprise makes various strategies such as; a strategy to stabilize the business in a turbulent situation, strategy to develop a product, strategy to expand the market, vertical integration, mergers, disinvestment, etc.
 

All Questions - MCO-021 - MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS - Masters of Commerce (Mcom) - First Semester 2024

                           IGNOU ASSIGNMENT SOLUTIONS          MASTER OF COMMERCE (MCOM - SEMESTER 1)                    MCO-021 - MANAGERIA...